Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Thesis: Affirmative Action.

Affirmative action was established in order to eliminate discrimination against race, gender, ethnicity, color, religion etc. It is there to protect the rights of all citizens that are considered minorities and to give them equal opportunity. Affirmative action is a very controversial issue because it protects minorities, but many may say that its "reverse discrimination." It is arguable that the same racism that discriminated against minority students, can easily be applied to the exclusion of white students through affirmative action.It first began with the civil rights movement, when African Americans demanded their rights as citizens of the United States. Today we are all portrayed as equals with the same opportunities to achieve prosperity and happiness.

Affirmative action affects students the most. There are many factors colleges have to take into account when they are considering applicants and one of them is minority status. Students who are considered a minority are more likely to be accepted by a college than non-minority students. Despite their color, why should someone who studies less than you, get ahead and you do not. It should not matter what your background is, the only thing that should matter is how hard a worker you are and what you have achieved in high school. It is true that racism still exists, but our priority as students is our education, and working hard is something we should be doing in order to succeed. Affirmative action was established to help stop racism and prejudice for minorities, but is it actually reversing its role?

Sunday, October 25, 2009

Clive Thompson On The New Literacy.

Clive Thomspson's article was about the "New Literacy," which is this new way young people communicate. He showed us professor Andrea Lunsford's research about this new literacy that she finds to be neither good nor bad, but simply taking a new direction. She says that today's young people like to write more for an audience rather than just a professor, that they want to make more of an impact on the world. Her research showed that thirty eight percent of writing took place outside of the classroom.
This article was very interesting to me. It actually made me think, and what professor Lunsford found with her research, I found to be very true. Personally I do enjoy writing for an audience rather than just doing pointless writing in school to get a good grade. For example, I enjoy writing letters to friends who are far away, even if I can speak to them faster on the internet, and I do write those letters without using online slang. She's right that now a days all young people just want to make an impact, want to be remembered in a way, and that is something I understand and relate to. I liked how professor Lunsford didn't find this type of writing bad, but just different. This article was short and to the point and it was relatable.


Questions.

1. Does the rest of the class also feel that they can relate to this article? That they do enjoy writing for a purpose and not just for school.
2. Does everyone find themselves writing more online than they do for school?(even if it is for texting or sending an email)
3. Do you believe that this is a new direction for writing or is it just bad?
4. When you read a book, do you feel like it has an impact on your life? (in a way changes you or your perspective, even if its a small change)

Sunday, October 18, 2009

R U Really Reading?

Motoko Rich's article is about young adults who do not like reading books, but enjoy a new way of reading online. Its true that todays teenagers do not find reading books fun, instead they spend endless hours on the internet. Many teenagers read short stories, articles, or anything that might interest them using the internet. Not many teenagers find books as interesting as their parents. This new way of reading might be difficult to understand especially for people who are over a certain age and are used to the traditional ways of reading. Our generation is used to the computers and this fast way of exchanging information, and because of our knowledge we are able to adapt more easily to the technologies yet to come. In the article Rich, does not make this new way of reading a negative issue, instead he shows both perspectives. He says how many countries are now testing students on their proficiency on the internet, not just on reading comprehension. I think that this can help for our future, because now a lot of things are based on using computers and other technologies. He says that some old fashioned people think that this type of reading is like "empty calories." They say that reading on the internet is not put in the right order, meaning that they don't have a middle, beginning, etc. Professor Rand J. Spiro feels that this is a good thing because "the world doesn't go in a line, and the world isn't organized into separate compartments or chapters."
I personally dislike reading books, I do not enjoy it, as many people do. Every time I start to read a book I think I might like, I feel impatient to get to the point, but it usually takes more time and then I can't go on reading it. The only books that I enjoy reading and can say that I cannot put down are the Twilight Saga. I would rather read online because there are so many things to research while reading. The internet opens a window of information for me to explore. Usually the reading I do online is short and to the point, which is exactly what I like. When you read actual books there are details that explain the mood, atmosphere, setting and all these things that take so much time to read and make reading tiresome. I feel that I should read more books because that helps expand my vocabulary and such things, but I cannot stand it because they are too long.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

New Media and The Slow Death of The Written Word.

From the first paragraph of Mark Zeltner's article, we can understand what his opinion on newspapers really is. He clearly states that he loves everything about newspapers and wanted to show his class the good things newspapers had to offer. He started off with a question "What do you think is the future of newspapers or, more specifically, what is the future of news on paper?". All he received from his question was confused looks. He quickly found that the question he was asking was wrong. He shouldn't ask "what will happen" but "when will it happen." His class remained, without a doubt, in favor of the new media.
Zeltner goes on to show that new media has its advantages but also, how many critics feel that it lacks the appreciation of traditional literature. He goes on to say that even though new technologies are growing in a very fast pace, he still feels that "there will always be a place for the printed newspaper in our society." Zeltner does not completely take the side of the newspaper, but states both the pros and cons for it and the new media.
I enjoyed reading his article because he did not just give us his opinion, he showed both sides of his argument in an interesting way. I agree that newspapers have their own charm, but technology is moving fast and the internet is our generations newspaper. Also, I agree the criticism that great pieces of literature are written, and thats how you can appreciate them.
Zeltner has created ten basic rules, which are helpful to students who are writing for the new media. Zeltner's first rule talks about quality over quantity. He tells the students that in the new media, longer is not necessarily better. Now a days we want to get our information fast, without any unnecessary details. The second rule is to make your piece pleasing. The content of your writing has to make the reader want to scroll down or click to see what's next. He says that you have to be aware of "how the reader is viewing and interacting with the material."
In rule three, Zeltner explains that in traditional writing, the authors think in words, then pages, then chapters and then books. In this new style of writing you have to keep the readers interested because if the writing is too long they may not pay attention to what they are reading. He mentions that you have to guide the reader to "figure our the paths" that you want them to take. Rule number four, tells the students when it is appropriate to use a photograph. The new media have it easy for writers to use photographs, with a click of a button you can upload anything. When using a photo, the traditional rules apply. If a particular photo captures the meaning better than the words then, Zeltner says, use it. He reminds the students not to forget to give a description of what is happening in the photo. Zeltner warns us that photos can also take away the readers attention. He says you have to use photographs to enhance your writing, using too many photos may throw off the reader.
Zeltner continues on to rule five, which talks about sound clips. Sound clips can show the impact of words by giving them a voice. He says that using music is also good because it set a certain mood. He tells the students that the audio clips should not take reader away from the words, but interest them to explore when they have finished reading, or before they begin. Zeltner goes on to rule number six about video clips. He says that the point of a video clip is to be short. Zeltner tells the students that video clips can convey a mood, much like audio clips. Video clips can help give the reader a glimpse of what you are trying to show in your writing. Keeping videos short will not completely distract your readers. Rule number seven on Zeltner's list is about footnotes and bibliographies. He says that setting up a bibliography page and a definitions page can be helpful to readers instead of just hyperlinking everything. Sometimes hyperlinking to a certain page, after a long time may not be there anymore, so setting up these two pages can help the reader find what they do not understand quicker and easier. Rule number eight is about keeping writing short and using hyperlinks. Hyperlinks can take away the reader from the writing and free them into another massive flow of information. The writers job is to make sure the reader doesn't trail off to another site. He tells the students to not overuse hyperlinks and if they really want to show the reader other sites, to simply add them to the bibliography page.
Zeltner's rule number nine talks about sidebars instead of hyperlinking. He feels that using sidebars, which are short story that "compliments" your main story, can limit the risk of the reader linking to another page and not finishing the story. He warns the student not to let the sidebar "upstage the main document". He also says to make sure you include ways to return back to the original story after clicking on the sidebar just incase the reader isn't interested. Don't make them work to find it. Zeltner's final rule, number ten, is to make sure the reader interprets your writing the way you meant it. He says that in the new media, the writer acts almost like a creator. The author has to in a way "broadcast media", all his or her writing, photographs, audio or video have to come together in order to make the story "visually interesting." Once again, he reminds the students to make sure not to get the readers attention away from the writing.
In my opinion, the ten rules made complete sense in making your writing more effective on the internet. Now we want our information fast, short, with visual and audio effects, and in order to not wonder to other sites, we need it to be interesting and pleasing. I think the ten rules overall captured what it should the writing be like for the new media very well. This is our generations way of writing.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Research

Natural Born Citizens
Article Two, Section One, Clause Five, states the requirements for becoming the President of the U.S.. The first on the list is being a natural born citizen. Many citizens that are not born in the U.S. may become high ranking officials. The Presidential Succession Act, is the way the succession of a President is determined. After the President who is in office at the time cannot fullfil his duties there is the Vice President who is next in line for the presidency. If the Vice President cannot take the office,then there is the Speaker of the House in line to take on the challenge and so on. If the person who is in line for the succession is not a natural born citizen, then they cannot stand to take on the role of President. This country is based on diversity and equal rights, and this law does not represent either. Equality is very important to the identity of the U.S., this is what our four fathers build the government upon. This law just shows that we are not all equal just because we're citizens. In my opinion, this is not fair because I was not born in the U.S. but I lived here all my life and I would not be able to assume the role of President.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_born_citizen

http://www.cklawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/vol81no1/Herlihy.pdf

Sunday, October 4, 2009

Research Topics.

Natural Born Citizens
United States law, clearly states that only natural born citizens can become President of the United States of America. Article Two, Section One, Clause Five, states the requirements for becoming the Presiden of the U.S.. The first on the list is being a natural born citizen. Many citizens that are not born in the U.S. may become high ranking officials. The Presidential Succession Act, is the way the succession of a President is determined. After the President who is in office at the time cannot fullfil his duties there is the Vice President who is next in line for the presidency. If the Vice President cannot take the office,then there is someone else in line to take on the challenge. If the person who is in line for the succession is not a natural born citizen, then they cannot stand to take on the role of President. In my opinion, this is not fair because I was not born in the U.S. but I lived here all my life and I would not be able to assume the role of President.

Affirmative Action
Affirmative Action gives equal opportunity to minority groups. This helps eliminate racism in jobs, education, etc.. What I would want to focus on is affirmative action in the education systems. I believe that all students should have the same opportunities when it come to higher education. This is a highly controversal matter but Iwant to state my opinion.

Our Rights
Many people, even now, don't know their rights as citizens of the United States. I believe that knowing what your rights are can prevent many misunderstandings and also help a person progress and become an active citizen in their country. Some local politicians send out brochures to their residents stating their rights. This helps citizens find out what they can do and not do and what others can and cant do to them. I think that our rights as citizens should be tought in our schools more.